
Journal
 of
 Comparative Psychology
1992,
 Vol.
 106,
 No. 2,
 114-119
Copyright
 1992
 by the
 American Psychological Association, Inc.
0735-7036/92/S3.00
Simultaneous
 Conditioning
 in
 Honeybees
 (Apis
 mellifera)
John
 D.
 Batson,
 James
 S.
 Hoban,
 and M. E.
 Bitterman
University
 of
 Hawaii
Honeybees
 (Apis
 mellifera)
 were classically conditioned
 with
 odor
 as
 conditioned stimulus (CS),
sucrose
 as
 unconditioned stimulus (US),
 and
 proboscis extension
 as
 response.
 The
 purpose
 of
Experiment
 1 (Ns = 26 and 27) was to
 look
 for
 facilitation
 of
 forward
 conditioning
 by
 CS-US
overlap,
 but
 rapid conditioning without overlap
 left
 little room
 for
 improvement.
 In 2
 further
experiments,
 CS and US
 were simultaneous,
 and
 response
 to
 odor alone
 was
 measured
 in
subsequent
 tests.
 In
 Experiment
 2, a
 Simultaneous group
 (N = 25)
 responded more
 to the
training
 odor than
 did an
 Unpaired control group
 (N =
 25).
 In
 Experiment
 3, a
 differentially
conditioned Simultaneous group
 (N = 29)
 responded more
 to an
 odor paired
 with
 sucrose
 in
training
 (S+) than
 to an
 odor presented alone (S-).
 The
 implications
 of the
 results
 for the
problem
 of the
 role
 of
 amount
 of
 reward
 in
 honeybee learning
 are
 considered.
Foraging honeybees trained with
 two
 targets
 different
 in
odor,
 one of
 which always contains
 a
 20-jd
 drop
 of 50%
sucrose solution
 and the
 other
 a
 5-/nl
 drop
 of the
 same
solution, quickly develop
 a
 preference
 for the
 20-/xl
 odor,
 a
preference
 that
 is
 most simply explained
 in
 terms
 of a
 stronger
association
 with sucrose
 (Couvillon,
 Lee,
 &
 Bitterman,
 1991).
Because
 the
 flying
 animals seem
 to
 detect
 20-jtl
 drops more
readily
 than
 5-/J
 drops (Walker, Lee,
 &
 Bitterman,
 1990),
 it
might
 be
 thought that
 the
 stronger association
 is due to
 closer
contiguity between
 the
 perception
 of the
 20-jul
 odor
 and the
initial taste
 of
 sucrose (the delay hypothesis),
 but
 that possi-
bility
 can be
 discounted
 on the
 basis that
 the
 preference
develops even when
 the
 locations
 of the
 drops
 are
 clearly
marked (Lee
 &
 Bitterman,
 1990b).
 A
 second possibility, more
difficult
 to
 test,
 is
 that
 the
 drops
 are
 differentially
 reinforcing
by
 virtue
 of
 their visual appearance
 or of
 some physical
property that
 is
 detected—as
 the
 concentration
 of
 sucrose
 is
detected—on
 initial contact
 of the
 proboscis (the immediate-
evaluation
 hypothesis).
 A
 third possibility,
 the
 focus
 of
 interest
here,
 is
 that strength
 of
 association
 increases with
 the
 duration
of
 concurrent
 odor-taste
 stimulation, which
 is
 greater
 for the
larger
 drop than
 for the
 smaller because
 the
 time required
 for
ingestion
 is
 greater (the concurrent-stimulation hypothesis).
In
 a
 suggestive experiment
 on
 simultaneous conditioning
 in
rats
 (Burkhardt
 &
 Ayres,
 1978),
 suppression
 of
 drinking
 by a
noise previously paired with shock
 was
 found
 to
 increase with
the
 duration
 of
 concurrent noise-shock stimulation.
The
 assumption
 of
 concurrent
 odor-taste
 association
 in
honeybees
 might seem insupportable
 in the
 light
 of
 some
This research
 was
 supported
 by
 Grant
 BNS
 9010609
 from
 the
National
 Science Foundation.
 The
 participation
 of
 John
 D.
 Batson,
on
 sabbatical leave
 from
 Furman
 University,
 was
 made
 possible
 in
part
 by a
 supplementary Research Opportunity Award
 from
 the
National Science Foundation
 and in
 part
 by
 Research Centers
 for
Minority
 Institutions Grant
 RR03061
 from
 the
 National
 Institutes
 of
Health.
 The
 participation
 of
 James
 S.
 Hoban
 was
 made
 possible
 by
Minority
 Biomedical
 Research Support Grant
 RRO8125
 from
 the
National Institutes
 of
 Health.
Correspondence concerning this article should
 be
 addressed
 to M.
E.
 Bitterman,
 Bekesy
 Laboratory
 of
 Neurobiology,
 1993
 East-West
Road, Honolulu, Hawaii 96822. Electronic
 mail
 may be
 sent
 to
experiments
 by
 Opfinger
 (1949)
 that were designed
 to
 deter-
mine when
 in the
 course
 of a
 visit
 to a
 feeding place
 foraging
honeybees learn about
 its
 odor.
 Opfinger's
 method
 was to
wait
 until
 her
 animals
 had
 landed
 at an
 odor
 source
 and
begun
 to
 feed
 then
 lift
 them
 briefly,
 and
 substitute
 a
 second
odor
 source
 for the
 first.
 Tested subsequently,
 the
 animals
preferred
 the
 landing odor
 to the
 feeding odor, which
 led
Opfinger
 to the
 questionable conclusion that they
 had
 learned
nothing
 about
 the
 feeding
 odor.
 In
 many instances,
 in
 fact,
the
 feeding
 odor
 was
 preferred
 to no
 odor,
 although that
preference
 in
 itself
 is not
 sufficient
 evidence
 of an
 association
between
 the
 feeding
 odor
 and
 sucrose.
One
 of the
 many techniques used
 to
 demonstrate simulta-
neous conditioning
 in
 vertebrates
 is the
 within-compound
conditioning technique (e.g.,
 Rescorla
 &
 Cunningham,
 1978),
which
 has
 been used also
 to
 look
 for
 evidence
 of
 association
between
 concurrent odors
 and
 colors
 in
 free-flying
 honeybees
(Couvillon
 &
 Bitterman,
 1982).
 The
 procedure was,
 first,
 to
reinforce
 each
 of
 two
 color-odor
 compounds (orange-jasmine
and
 yellow-lemon targets
 with
 sucrose solution were pre-
sented
 on
 successive visits
 to the
 laboratory), then
 to
 differ-
entially
 reinforce either
 the
 odors
 or the
 colors alone (e.g.,
jasmine
 reinforced
 vs.
 lemon unreinforced),
 and finally to
look
 for
 differential
 response
 to the
 remaining components
(e.g.,
 orange
 vs.
 yellow)
 in a
 choice
 test.
 Because
 the
 colors
 of
the
 targets probably were detected
 before
 their odors
 in the
first
 stage
 of
 training (see
 von
 Frisch,
 1920),
 color-odor
associations might have been expected
 on the
 basis
 of
 sequen-
tial stimulation alone.
 The
 effectiveness
 of
 concurrent stim-
ulation
 can be
 inferred,
 however,
 from
 the
 symmetry
 of the
results
 for
 color
 and
 odor;
 in the
 example given, orange
 was
preferred
 in the
 third stage
 after
 jasmine
 had
 been
 differen-
tially reinforced
 in the
 second,
 and
 jasmine
 was
 preferred
 in
the
 third stage
 after
 orange
 had
 been differentially reinforced
in
 the
 second.
In
 these
 experiments
 we
 look
 for
 evidence
 of
 concurrent
odor-taste
 association
 with
 a
 classical
 conditioning technique
that
 affords
 somewhat better control
 of
 stimulation than
 is
possible
 in
 work with
 free-flying
 foragers
 (Frings,
 1944;
 Ku-
wabara,
 1957; Takeda,
 1961).
 The
 animals
 are not
 depended
on
 to
 expose themselves
 to the
 training stimuli
 but are
 trained
while
 they
 are
 harnessed
 in
 small tubes.
 The
 conditioned
114