HTML Preview Likert Scale Survey page number 1.


Likert-Type Scale Response Anchors
Citation:
Vagias, Wade M. (2006). Likert-type scale response anchors. Clemson International Institute for Tourism
& Research Development, Department of Parks, Recreation and Tourism Management. Clemson
University.
Level of Acceptability
1 – Totally unacceptable
2 – Unacceptable
3 – Slightly unacceptable
4 – Neutral
5 – Slightly acceptable
6 – Acceptable
7 – Perfectly Acceptable
Level of Appropriateness
1 – Absolutely inappropriate
2 – Inappropriate
3 – Slightly inappropriate
4 – Neutral
5 – Slightly appropriate
6 – Appropriate
7 – Absolutely appropriate
Level of Importance
1 – Not at all important
2 – Low importance
3 – Slightly important
4 – Neutral
5 – Moderately important
6 – Very important
7 – Extremely important
Level of Agreement
1 – Strongly disagree
2 – Disagree
3 – Somewhat disagree
4 – Neither agree or
disagree
5 – Somewhat agree
6 – Agree
7 – Strongly agree
Knowledge of Action
1 – Never true
2 – Rarely true
3 – Sometimes but
infrequently true
4 – Neutral
5 – Sometimes true
6 – Usually true
7 – Always true
Reflect Me?
1 – Very untrue of me
2 – Untrue of me
3 – Somewhat untrue of me
4 – Neutral
5 – Somewhat true of me
6 – True of me
7 – Very true of me
My beliefs
1 – Very untrue of what I believe
2 – Untrue of what I believe
3 – Somewhat untrue of what I
believe
4 – Neutral
5 – Somewhat true of what I
believe
6 – True of what I believe
7 – Very true of what I believe
Priority:
1 – Not a priority
2 – Low priority
3 – Somewhat priority
4 – Neutral
5 – Moderate Priority
6 – High priority
7 – Essential priority
Level of Concern
1 – not at all concerned
2 – Slightly concerned
3 – Somewhat concerned
4 – Moderately concerned
5 – Extremely concerned
Priority Level
1 – Not a priority
2 – Low priority
3 – Medium priority
4 – High priority
5 – Essential
Level of Problem
1 – Not at all a problem
2 – Minor problem
3 – Moderate problem
4 – Serious problem
Affect on X
1 – No affect
2 – Minor affect
3 – Neutral
4 – Moderate affect
5 – Major affect
Level of Consideration
1 – Would not consider
2 – Might or might not consider
3 – Definitely consider
Level of Support/Opposition
1 – Strongly oppose
2 – Somewhat oppose
3 – neutral
4 – Somewhat favor
5 – Strongly favor
Level of Probability
1 – Not probable
2 – Somewhat improbable
3 – Neutral
4 – Somewhat probable
5 – Very probable
Level of Agreement
1 – Strongly disagree
2 – Disagree
3 – Neither agree or disagree
4 – Agree
5 – Strongly agree
Level of Desirability
1 – Very undesirable
2 – Undesirable
3 – neutral
4 – Desirable
5 – Very desirable
Level of Participation
1 – No, and not considered
2 – No, but considered
3 – Yes
Frequency – 5 point
1 – Never
2 – Rarely
3 – Sometimes
4 – Often
5 – Always
Frequency
1 – Never
2 – Rarely
3 – Occasionally
4 – A moderate amount
5 – A great deal
Frequency of Use
1 – Never
2 – Almost never
3 – Occasionally/Sometimes
4 – Almost every time
5 – Every time
DOWNLOAD HERE


If it really was a no–brainer to make it on your own in business there’d be millions of no–brained, harebrained, and otherwise dubiously brained individuals quitting their day jobs and hanging out their own shingles. Nobody would be left to round out the workforce and execute the business plan. | Bill Rancic